Monthly Archives - November 2019

Most Common Mistakes Startups Make Relating to Intellectual Property

By Gunnar Pippel on Shutterstock This is the era of the digital. Every now and then, diverse kinds of businesses spring up, promising the next big thing. These businesses usually start out having bright prospects as well as looking to offer stellar services and solutions. Businesswise, these start-ups seem to have everything in place. Marketing, finance, accounting, operations, distribution, organization, etc, all sorted out. Yet,  an important aspect of their business strategy is often ignored, that is, intellectual property. In today’s digital economy, intellectual property (IP) is a very important aspect that can no longer be overlooked. Intangibles now command a large share of the overall worth of businesses as a result of the evolution from the industrialized economy to the knowledge-driven economy. In the knowledge-driven economy, the greatest assets of businesses are their technological innovations, creations, brand, and goodwill, all of which can be protected as intellectual property. Start-ups, particularly at the seed stage, fail to realize that they possess intangible or intellectual assets worth protecting, as their focus at this time is getting seed funding for their business and getting it running. If precautions are not taken, they may realize too late that some of their most important assets have been misappropriated or have become subjects of serious contention. Here are some of the common mistakes Start-ups make with regards to their IP.  

Not Protecting Their IP Early Enough

Start-ups sometimes make the mistake of not seeking IP protection for their intangible assets early enough. These could be due to several reasons including:
  • Considering IP protection too expensive, especially at the earliest stages of the business. It is more expensive, trying to fix the consequences of failing to take necessary precautions from the onset, than trying to seek IP protection at the appropriate time. Your IP may fall into the public domain if you are unable to prove that yours is first in time. This is because registration with the appropriate agencies is the surest way to prove priority. 
  • Hastening to enter into the market with their goods or services. Some start-ups make the mistake of releasing their goods or services into the market before securing protection for their IP. This likely stems from the misconception that protection could be secured at any time. However, as with some classes of IP, there is a window of opportunity for securing protection, failure to do so could likely result in the IP falling into the public domain.
  • Ignorance of the fact that every start-up has at least one class of IP. These could include clients' lists, customer databases, manuals, designs, colours, logos, software, etc.
  • Considering IP protection unnecessary. This happens mostly when Start-up owners are unaware of the benefits of early IP protection for their IP assets.
 

Failure To Clearly Determine Ownership of IP

You’re probably familiar with this scenario. A start-up owner commissions a web developer to design an online presence for the firm, for instance, a website. The web developer gets paid and does the work. The start-up owner is very satisfied. He assumes that since he has paid for the design of the website, then he is the owner. This, however, is not true. The web developer, in fact, is the owner of the website and the IP contained therein unless and until he/she transfers ownership of the website to the start-up owner. The web developer could bring an infringement lawsuit against the start-up company should the contents of the website be modified or used without the permission of the web developer. To avoid this, at the point of commissioning the web developer as an independent contractor, a work-for-hire agreement should be executed transferring ownership to the start-up. Another instance where Start-ups fail to clearly determine ownership of IP is assuming that creations or innovations of employees belong to the firm. The only time this holds true is where the work is done in the course of employment and within the scope of employment. Thus, if employee A is employed as an editor of children's storybooks, if employee A writes a poem after office hours, the employer cannot lay claim to the copyright in the work. To clearly determine ownership of IP as a Start-up, terms of engagement with regards to IP should be clearly spelt out in the employee-employer agreement.  

Failing to Realize the Importance of Expert IP Guidance

Small businesses, especially at the beginning phase of the business, make the mistake of adopting a "do-it-yourself" approach in managing their IP. This is borne out of the misconception that IP issues are not so complex and can be handled without the guidance of an expert in the field of IP. Au contraire, there may be knotty issues that can be spotted by an IP expert, but easily missed by a non-IP practitioner.  

Inadequate IP Safeguards

One common IP mistake start-ups make is not putting in place adequate IP safeguards to ensure their IP is immune from infringement. Inadequate or improper documentation, poorly drafted employee confidentiality agreements or the absence of any, and not executing non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with third parties are some of the ways businesses fail to adequately safeguard their IP.  

Failure To Conduct IP Due Diligence

Conducting IP due diligence allows a start-up to take stock of its IP portfolio and answer the following questions: what are its IP assets? What are the types of IP it has? Who are the creators/inventors? Who owns the IP? Are there issues with the IP and/or what are the actions to take to rectify the issues? By answering the above questions, the start-up is able to determine the existence of prior art in the case of patents, the status of its IP, whether they are registered or not, and so on. Also, taking stock of a firm's IP allows it to determine the assets to keep using; those assets to license out or assign, hence reducing the costs of managing their IP portfolio. When a start-up fails to take stock of its IP portfolio, they are exposed to infringement by third parties. Also, the company may be susceptible to infringement lawsuits from others in the event that the company's IP infringes on that of others.  

Not Integrating IP Management Into The Overall Business Strategy

IP is an irresistible driving force in any organization that seeks to be taken seriously and that seeks to enhance its value and gain competitive advantage. However, most start-ups fail to realize the immense benefits of IP to their business hence IP is relegated to the background. It is sometimes regarded as something that can be sorted out along the way. The result is that other core aspects of the business (marketing, finance, accounting, operations, distribution, etc) are adequately and promptly catered to, leaving IP to chance. The fact remains that due to the pivotal role IP plays in a business, it ought to be integrated into the overall business strategy of the start-up from the very beginning. The benefits are enormous.  

Neglecting to Consider Digital IP Dimensions

Failure to consider securing the digital presence of a start-up could affect its interaction with potential customers and clients online. Due to the wide reach of the internet, more and more businesses now realize the importance of having a digital presence. This has also been capitalized on by unscrupulous people who may wish to benefit from the brand name or goodwill of an existing business. One example of this is cybersquatting. Cybersquatters secure domain names that bear the names or identity of existing businesses who have neglected to promptly secure their domain names. These cybersquatters then seek to sell the domain names at a very high price to these businesses. Although cybersquatting is frowned upon by the law, the process of seeking redress can be quite harrowing, time and resource consuming.  

Engaging in a Pitch Competition Without Adequate IP Safeguards

In a previous article, I have succinctly addressed the risks in engaging in a pitch competition without adequate IP safeguards.   Feel free to check up on us in our Telegram Group or our Telegram Channel if you have questions. We look forward to engaging you. You're also welcome to interact directly with the FINT Team. Join our Telegram Group: https://t.me/FINTConsulting or our Telegram Channel: https://t.me/FINTChannel. See you there. DISCLAIMER: This article is written for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Consult a lawyer for tailored legal advice.
Read more...

Venture Capital Funding in Blockchain and Crypto Projects

Image Source: Stevepb from Pixabay [lwptoc]

Introduction

Capital is key for any business to take off, be it a traditional form of business or businesses built on emerging technologies. Blockchain and crypto startups have available several fundraising methods ranging from traditional Venture Capital funding to the decentralized model of fundraising such as Initial Coin Offering (ICOs), Security Token Offerings (STOs), Initial Exchange  Offerings (IEOs), Initial DEX Offerings (IDOs), etc.  ICO is the most common fundraising method in the blockchain space. With about  875 projects raising approximately US$6.3 billion in the year 2017, while $19.2 billion was raised in 2018. Despite the huge success of ICOs in 2017 and the early part of 2018, this mode of fundraising faced a  downward slide in the later part of 2018 because of fraudulent activities, which the crypto community now refers to as crypto winter. The need to regulate ICOs and protect investors who want to invest in crypto-based projects from fraudsters in the blockchain space saw the birth of STOs. STO is a more regulated process of raising funds in the blockchain space and it also created awareness to the public on ICOs and its shortcomings. An ICO is essentially an unregulated tool used to raise funds for blockchain or crypto-based projects. The shortcomings of ICOs had given rise to STOs and IEOs. IEOs are  ICOs with a new layer of intervention and regulation that attempts to ensure value and mitigate risks for participants. STOs, on the other hand, have such a high barrier (must be accredited by Security Exchange Commission) for investors to participate in that they are not a viable option for fundraising.

What is Venture Capital?

Venture capital is a form of private equity financing that investors provide to startup companies and small businesses that are believed to have long-term growth potential. Venture capital generally comes from wealthy investors, investment institutions such as investment banks or other financial institutions. This type of funding does not always take monetary form, it can also be provided in the form of technical or managerial expertise. Venture capital is provided in the interest of generating a return on investment (ROI) through an eventual exit such as a Merger and Acquisition (M&A), or Initial Public Offering (IPO) of the company.

Origin of Venture Capital

The origin of Venture capital can be traced back to the 19th century, Venture Capital only developed as an industry after the Second World War ( WWII). Georges Doriot is considered the "Father of Venture Capital". In 1946 he founded American Research and Development Corporation (ARDC)  he raised a $3.5 million fund to invest in companies that commercialized technologies developed during WWII. ARDC's first investment was in a company that had ambitions to use X-ray technology for cancer treatment. The $200,000 that Doriot invested turned into $1.8 million at the exit stage when the company went public in 1955.

How it Works

Start-up seeking to raise venture capital is required to make a research for VCs after which they submit a business plan. The business plan does not necessarily need to be bulky but should be clear about the business.  If interested, the VC  or angel investor also performs due diligence, which includes;
  • a thorough background check of the company's business model,
  •  products,  
  • management  (team)
  • operating history etc 
After due diligence by the VC, parties (investor and entrepreneur/founder) then negotiate the investment deal. 

Venture Capital in Blockchain and Crypto Projects 

Venture capital financing is not limited to traditional businesses. The rise of awareness in crypto-assets has given many VCs a new opportunity to reinvent VC financing by leveraging the ICO fundraising model and incorporating it into traditional VC models of financing.

Types of Venture Capital Funds in Blockchain and Crypto Projects 

The rapid growth of the crypto market has awakened the interest of Venture Capitalists in blockchain and crypto projects. The new opportunities opened with significant liquidity and financial flexibility offered by crypto-assets. Venture Capitalists (VCs) are gradually diversifying their portfolios by creating hybrid funding models or launching crypto-centric funds to directly invest in blockchain start-ups,  crypto projects etc. These new hybrid funding models are;
  1. Crypto-Funds 
  2. Crypto Fund  of Funds (FOFs)
  3. Tokenized Venture Funds 
  4. Reversed ICOs

Crypto Fund

VCs raise a pool of capital from investors and establish a separate fund (crypto fund) to invest in a blockchain start-up’s equity and, or crypto-assets. These investments  may include: 
  1. Crypto-assets purchased on a secondary market,
  2.  Crypto-assets purchased in a pre-sale or ICO sale  and, 
  3.  Blockchain tech start-up equity. 
The crypto fund can invest in one or more of the above-mentioned projects. This investment process involves setting up a separate fund or raising capital from investors which included accredited investors, fund of funds or other investors who are comfortable with investing in the crypto space. 

Tokenized Venture Fund 

A tokenized venture fund is also known as a ‘tokenized fund’.This is a  newly-created funding structure that takes the ICO model and applies it to the ownership structure of the fund.  It enables the venture capital fund to launch its own tokenized securities offering to raise funds from a larger pool of investors and investors in the fund in return can trade their equity tokens of the fund on a crypto-exchange as soon as the tokens are listed.  The rationale behind a tokenized fund is to provide liquidity for investors and eliminate long-term capital commitments.

Reverse ICOs

VCs  also exploit  the liquidity of  cryptocurrencies as  a means of exit for  venture capital investments that is rather  than waiting for the start-up to mature to the stage  that it can go public through an IPO (Initial Public Offering) or  other conventional exit strategies, VCs may engage in ‘reverse ICOs’ to  help them get a faster return, and the funds can be reinvested into another crypto  project. An example of a VC that has explored this method is KiK.

Fund of Funds 

This type of financing, a venture capital fund sets up a crypto-fund to invest in other crypto-specific funds. This allows for greater diversification of risk by investing in multiple funds simultaneously an example is the Union  Square Ventures (USV) that has invested in six crypto funds. Although some VC firms have taken illiquid assets and issued tradable crypto-assets that give investors rights in these assets  (“asset-backed tokens”), others have raised capital for tokens which provide its investors with rights to a portfolio of VC backed companies or real estate while some crypto firms have started  venture capital arms, focusing mainly on projects relating to blockchain technology and crypto-assets.

What VCs Look out for in  Blockchain and Crypto Startups Before They Consider Funding 

VCs lookout for the following in blockchain or crypto projects before funding. Blockchain startups and/or entrepreneurs are encouraged to work on these points before pitching VCs
  1. Solutions: VCs look at the real-life problem the project intends to solve, not an imaginary one.
  2. Team:  They look at the key team members background, experience and reputation. They would want to find out if the team was formed a few months ago without any relevant experience to the blockchain or project or have they been working on the project for a long time and have relevant experience?
  3. Community and Institutional Support: VCs check out the crypto community such as Github, BitcoinTalk, Telegram, etc to see whether the project is supported or criticized by the community. If the project’s community on Telegram or Github is showing no development progress, dead or closed, the blockchain project most likely has failed or will to do so within a short while. If the project is designed to create solutions for example, in the power sector, VCs will look out for institutions in the power sector that are in support of the project. 
  4. The Technology and Project: It is highly recommended that startups understand the technology behind the project. How feasible it is. If it is innovative? Is blockchain necessary for the project? There are many projects in the market that try to solve a problem where blockchain is not needed. VC investment in such projects may not happen. VCS may also ask if the team already have a minimum viable product and what stage is the development of the product?
  5. Investors and Network Investors would want to know Who is backing the project? If they are Friends, family, institutions? Do the founders or entrepreneurs have their own money in there? Who’s talking about this project, and where? Telegram, LinkedIn, Facebook, press and news sources, etc.
  6. Viability of The Business: is the business viable? Is it capable of meeting their expected Return of Investment (ROI)?
  7. Market Opportunities: The size of the market, the number of customers willing to use the product and also pay for it. 
  8. Market Strategy and Cost: How the entrepreneurs intend to break into the market and the cost implication of entering the market.
These and many more are what the VCs look out for before they stake their funds. 

CONCLUSION 

Although fundraising is a necessity for blockchain and crypto startups, the channel employed by the entrepreneur or founder determines the sustainability and success of the business. ICOs may be a faster way of raising funds, but does not guarantee the sustainable growth of a blockchain project while VC process of raising fund may be slow because of what the VCs need to investigate before they commence the funding deal, it provides long term investment and success in the growth of the project. Here is a list of blockchain VC firms that may interest you.   Feel free to check up on us in our Telegram Group or our Telegram Channel if you have questions. We look forward to engaging you. You're also welcome to interact directly with the FINT Team. Join our Telegram Group: https://t.me/FINTConsulting or our Telegram Channel: https://t.me/FINTChannel. See you there. DISCLAIMER: This article is written for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Consult a lawyer for tailored legal advice.
Read more...